Article 199 with the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other sufficient remedy is provided by legislation." It truly is nicely-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust out there remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Unfortunately, that wasn't accurate. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son explained to his parents that the boy experienced molested him. The boy was arrested two times later, and admitted to having sexually molested the pair’s son several times.
In this landmark case, the Supreme Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment on the grounds of extenuating circumstances. The court acknowledged that while the crime of murder was established, the offender experienced a history of mental illness, which played a significant role in committing the offense. This case established a precedent for looking at mitigating factors during sentencing.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Presented the legal analysis on the subject issue, we've been on the view that the claim of your petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle will not be legally audio, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, These are topic to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case with the petitioners for promotion can be regarded as, however, we've been apparent in our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded for seniority and promotion given that the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum fitness, matter to availability of vacancy issue for the approval of the competent authority.
long period petitioner wasn't considered for promotion, meeting of the departmental promotion committee and think about the petitioner (Promotion)
For your foregoing reasons the instant suit is dismissed with no order concerning cost. Office to prepare decree in the above mentioned terms. Read more
148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh here & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Given the legal analysis on the subject issue, we're with the view that the claim from the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is not really legally sound, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They are really matter to rules and regulations If your recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case of the petitioners for promotion could possibly be regarded as, however, we're very clear within our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded for seniority and promotion since the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health and fitness, issue to availability of vacancy subject for the approval from the competent authority. Read more
This guide offers valuable insights into free online resources offering access to Pakistani case law, helping you navigate the complexities of legal research.
This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners failed a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based to the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances from the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 in the Constitution. Read more
2. I have read the discovered counsel for the parties and figured out DPG at size, perused the record and observed that:-
The scrupulous reader may have noticed a little something earlier mentioned: a flaw. Past the first 7 words, the definition focuses within the intention to cause “Injury,” not the intention to cause death. The two fundamental elements that must be proven in order to convict a person of the crime are “
Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury into a person, by performing an act which during the ordinary course of nature is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently perilous that it must in all chance cause death, causes the death on the these person, is said to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”
Try to look for websites affiliated with trustworthy legal institutions or organizations. Verify the information against other sources when doable.
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary into the determination in the current case are called obiter dicta, which represent persuasive authority but usually are not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil regulation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]